In Corporation of the City of Bangalore v. M. Papaiah and another (1989) 3 SCC 612 it was held that
“it is firmly established that revenue records are not documents of title, and the question of interpretation of document not being a document of title is not a question of law.”
In Guru Amarjit Singh v. Rattan Chand and others (1993) 4 SCC 349 The Supreme Court has held that
“that the entries in jamabandi are not proof of title”.
In State of Himachal Pradesh v. Keshav Ram and others (1996), 11 SCC 257 this Court held that
“The entries in the revenue papers, by no stretch of imagination can form the basis for the declaration of title in favour of the plaintiff.”
