Search This Blog

Translate the Site.

Showing posts with label compromise decree. Show all posts
Showing posts with label compromise decree. Show all posts

Tuesday, 8 February 2022

Suprem court : jurisdiction of the Lok Adalat under Section 20 is to facilitate a settlement of disputes between the parties in a case.

 NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (NOIDA) V/s YUNUS & ORS. CIVIL APPEAL NO.901 OF 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 9927 of 2020)

It is clear beyond the shadow of any doubt that the jurisdiction of the Lok Adalat under Section 20 is to facilitate a settlement of disputes between the parties in a case. It has no adjudicatory role. It cannot decide a lis. All that it can do is to bring about a genuine compromise or settlement. 

The Lok Adalat by virtue of the express provisions is only a facilitator of settlement and compromise in regard to matters which are referred to it. It has no adjudicatory role (See State of Punjab & Anr. v. Jalour Singh & Ors (supra))

In Union of India v. Ananto (Dead) & Anr.14, this Court inter alia held as follows:

“7. The specific language used in sub-section (3) of Section 20 makes it clear that the Lok Adalat can dispose of a matter by way of a compromise or settlement between the parties. Two crucial terms in sub-sections (3) and(5) of Section 20 are "compromise" and "settlement". The former expression means settlement of differences by mutual concessions. It is an agreement reached by adjustment of conflicting or opposing claims by reciprocal modification of demands.

As per Termes de la Ley, "compromise is a mutual promise of two or more parties that are at controversy". As per Bouvier it is "an agreement between two or more persons, who, to avoid a law suit,amicably settle their differences, on such terms as they can agree upon".The word "compromise" implies some element of accommodation on each side. It is not apt to describe total surrender. [See Re NFU Development Trust Ltd. [1973] 1 All ER 135(Ch.D)]. A compromise is always bilateral and means mutual adjustment. "Settlement" is termination of legal proceedings by mutual consent. The case at hand did not involve compromise or settlement and could not have been disposed of by Lok Adalat. If no compromise or settlement is or could be arrived at, no order can be passed by the Lok Adalat. Therefore, question of merger of Lok Adalats order does not arise.”

https://www.livelaw.in/pdf_upload/new-okhla-industrial-development-authority-noida-vs-yunus-2022-livelaw-sc-123-408906.pdf